MBSE Modeling and Trade Studies for Energy Equipment Supply Networks

01

Project Background

Supply planning discussions often rely on separate spreadsheets with inconsistent definitions. In this project, we model suppliers, components, delivery locations, and transport relationships in an inspectable system model to compare supply options, rather than simply reproduce a business report.

02

Technical Approach

First establish an object dictionary, recording fixed attributes separately from parameters that vary between options. Retain sources and validity periods for costs, capabilities, and supply constraints to avoid mixing data from different time bases in one comparison.

03

Implementation Process

Pilot with one component family, checking substitution relationships, quantity units, and location links, then develop multiple options that can be recalculated. Retain parameter snapshots and reasons for each adjustment, checking data completeness before discussing rankings.

04

Deliverables

Deliver the supply network model, parameter and source table, candidate options, and comparative analysis records. Each item identifies its version, inputs, operating environment, and corresponding acceptance steps, with one review by the recipient in the agreed environment.

05

Acceptance Approach

Business owners check whether model objects match actual workflows, while the technical team checks whether calculations and references can be reproduced. The model supports discussion of options; it does not replace procurement review or supplier qualification checks.

06

Implementation Outcomes

Compare supply options on a consistent basis.

We retain candidate supply relationships and assumptions in a shared baseline, reducing the need to reorganize data for each discussion.

Assess efficiency through time per option configuration, duplicate data entries, and missed constraints. Confirm economic benefits separately using actual procurement execution data.